Literary Theories

Blogger templates

Blogger news

Blogroll

About

Powered by Blogger.
Friday, January 18, 2013

 MOVIE


THE FILMS OF JOHN CASSAVETES: 

PRAGMATISM, MODERNISM, AND THE MOVIES








American Pragmatism is a political philosophy rooted in the twin principles of action and usefulness. "If we take this action, will it be more useful than that action?" That is the basic question of American pragmatism.

The great American pragmatists, of course, are names that we once held up in this country with great pride, Ralph Waldo Emerson, William James, Abraham Lincoln.


The Analysis:


The Films of John Cassavetes: Pragmatism, Modernism, and the Movies is the first book to tell in detail the story of a maverick filmmaker who worked outside the studio system. Providing extended critical discussion on six of his most important films (Shadows, Faces, Minnie and Moskowitz, A Woman Under the Influence, The Killing of a Chinese Bookie, and Love Streams), Ray Carney argues that Cassavetes' work is a distinctly life-affirming form of modernist expression that is at odds with the world-denying modernism of many of the most important art works produced in this century. Cassavetes is revealed to be a profoundly thoughtful and self-aware filmmaker and a deeply philosophical thinker, whose work takes its place in the American tradition along with the writings of Ralph Waldo Emerson and William James. The six films treated here emerge as expressive interpretations of the bewildering challenges in contemporary American cultural experience.

THE INTERPRETATION:


This movie perfectly suits the American Pragmatism, because aside from having an American culture or experiences in this movie, the flow of the story has no complications though it has some aspects of situations or experiences which involves the modernist expressions rather than ideas.


 MOVIE


FISHING A BORDERLESS SEA

Brian J. Payne





Territorialism / Possessions (objects of desire) are metaphors for who we are or how we wish to be perceived—aspects of the “self.”. It may be tangible or intangible (my car or my idea, e.g.)
They occupy mental space: cognitive, affective, and conative.
These spaces strongly resemble territories—with rights of ownership, markers, boundaries, rules of “in” and “out,” defensive strategies, etc.



The Summary:


Over the centuries, processing and distribution of products from land and sea has stimulated the growth of a global economy. In the broad sweep of world history, it may be hard to imagine a place for the meager little herring baitfish. Yet, as Brian Payne adeptly recounts, the baitfish trade was hotly contested in the Anglo-American world throughout the nineteenth century. Politicians called for wars, navies were dispatched with guns at the ready, vessels were seized at sea, and violence erupted at sea.
Yet, the battle over baitfish was not simply a diplomatic or political affair. Fishermen from hundreds of villages along the coastline of Atlantic Canada and New England played essential roles in the construction of legal authority that granted or denied access to these profitable bait fisheries.


  THE INTERPRETATION:


The movie Fishing a Borderless Sea illustrates how everyday laborers created a complex system of environmental stewardship that enabled them to control the local resources while also allowing them access into the larger global economy.

LITERARY GENRE: NOVEL



HARRY POTTER AND THE SORCERER'S STONE

J.K ROWLING





According to Marxists, and to other scholars in fact, literature reflects those social institutions out of which it emerges and is itself a social institution with a particular ideological function. Literature reflects class struggle and materialism: think how often the quest for wealth traditionally defines characters. So Marxists generally view literature "not as works created in accordance with timeless artistic criteria, but as 'products' of the economic and ideological determinants specific to that era" (Abrams 149). Literature reflects an author's own class or analysis of class relations, however piercing or shallow that analysis may be.



The Plot Summary:



The story begins with a description of the Dursleys, an utterly normal family in England, who are left with baby Harry Potter on their doorsteps. Aunt Petunia's sister Lily married James Potter and became a powerful couple in the wizard's world. They were killed by the evil Voldemort, leaving Harry with a large scar on his forehead and legacy as the only wizard to escape Voldemort alive. Head wizard Albus Dumbledore decides to have Harry grow up with the Dursleys until he is ready to attend Hogwarts, the premiere magic school in England. At age 11, Harry is whisked away to Hogwarts by the giant gamekeeper, Hagrid, to find himself lost amongst a new world of magic and power.

Hagrid takes Harry to Diagon Alley, where he retrieves some of his inheritance from Gringotts, the wizard bank, and purchases his books, wand, and robes from the Leaky Cauldron and Ollivanders. On the train to Hogwarts at platform Nine and Three Quarters, Harry meets his new friend Ron Weasley and Hermione Granger. Everyone is amazed to meet the famous Harry Potter. On the train Harry also meets Draco Malfoy, a boy with whom he develops a distrust and hatred. At Hogwarts, the children meet Dumbledore, McGonagall, Snape, and Quirrell, all professors and wizards. At the opening banquet, the Sorting Hat decides in which house the children live, sorting Hermione, Neville, Ron, and Harry into Gryffindor, and Draco Malfoy into Slytherin, the house run by Snape and known to have schooled Voldemort in years past.

Hermione busies herself with studies, Ron with chess, and Harry with learning about his family and powers. He becomes an expert at flying and is allowed to play Quidditch for Gryffindor's team. Draco Malfoy continually tries to get the Gryffindor kids in trouble, by setting them up and dragging them away from their beds at the wrong time. One day, Ron and Harry come across a large troll and rescue Hermione from death. From then on, the threesome spies on Snape and Quirrell and seek to discover the secrets at Hogwarts. They realize that the Sorceror's Stone is hidden by a three-headed dog at Hogwarts and is the secret to eternal life created by Nicholas Flamel. They believe Snape is the culprit behind the evil and try to stop him from destroying Harry and Hogwarts.

Meanwhile, Hagrid keeps an eye on Harry and looks out for him. They visit Hagrid and meet his new pet dragon, Norbert. Norbert causes problems for everyone, as dragons are illegal animals. The three send the dragon away to Romania under Harry's Invisibility Cloak and are discovered out of bed doing so. They are branded and punished with detention and stricken of fifty points each. As detention the kids must help clean up the Forbidden Forest with Hagrid. They find a unicorn slaughtered, with its blood scattered across the ground, and are frightened by an evil spirit. The good centaur Firenze flies Harry away from danger in the forest as soon as he discovers who Harry is.

Harry, Ron, and Hermione discover that Voldemort tricked Hagrid into revealing the method by which to get past the three-headed dog and to the Sorcerer's Stone. They rush past the dog, and through the chambers to stop Voldemort from killing Harry. Ron gets everyone past the life sized Wizard's Chess board, while Hermione breaks the riddle that allows Harry to proceed to the ultimate chamber under ground. He sees the Mirror of Erised, the same mirror that shows the hopes and dreams of the person who looks inside. He finds Quirrell in the chamber without his stutter. He admits to hosting Voldemort and trying to destroy Harry in the forest. When his turban is removed, Harry sees a double face on top of Quirrell's head - it is Voldemort, and he wants to use Harry to get the Stone and then kill him. Harry discovers the Stone in his pocket and tries to kill Voldemort/Quirrel until he blacks out.

Harry awakens in the infirmary to Dumbledore congratulating him. He saved the Stone, Hogwarts, and his own life. Because of his bravery and that of Hermione, Ron, and Neville, Gryffindor wins the House Cup for the year. Harry must go back to the Dursleys for the summer, but looks forward to all the magic he will practice and learn in the future.




THE INTERPRETATION:



Marxist literary criticism is based upon the political and economic theories of the German philosopher Karl Marx. His theory is formulated specifically to analyze how society functions in a state of upheaval and constant change. Harry Potter's world, the Muggle (non-magical) world, but especially his magical world illustrates the properties of a Marxist society.

In Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone a group known as the Ministry of Magic governs the magical world. It is reiterated time after time in the novel that the rules set down by this governing body must be adhered at all times or the punishment shall be severe, for example imprisonment in the Wizard's prison of Azkaban where the mind is virtually erased. Or a much worse sentence could be handed down that being death. This ministry uses the veil of intimidation to coerce the witches and wizards into following their rules much like Karl Marx wanted his followers to do.

LITERARY GENRE: SHORT STORY


SO MUCH WATER, SO CLOSE TO HOME

RAYMOND CARVER



Deconstruction criticism posits an undecidability of meaning for all texts. The text has intertwined and contradictory discourses, gaps, and incoherencies, since language itself is unstable and arbitrary. The critic doesn't undermine the text; the text already dismantles itself. Its rhetoric subverts or undermines its ostensible meaning.

Deconstructive critics focus on the text like the formalists, but direct attention to the opposite of the New Critical "unities." Instead, they view the "decentering" of texts and point out incompatabilities, rhetorical grain-against-grain contradictions, undecidability within texts. There is often a playfulness to deconstruction, but it can be daunting to read too.





The Plot Summary:



The story features Stuart, his wife Claire and their son Dean. They live together, as a married couple, we don’t know where they live, but it seems like a small town of some sort.

One day Stuart and his friends leaves on a fishing trip, in the mountains, for a couple of days, to play some poker, drink some whiskey and obviously fish. One night one of the guys finds a body, floating around in the water. The men ties the body to a tree, and gets back to drinking. They drink and have fun for the rest of the trip, but decides to leave a day earlier than planned. They call the sheriff about the body, and head home.
He tells his wife about the incident the next morning, this leads to a lot of problems. Not only is she mad that he waited to tell her a story like that, but they slowly seem to drift away from each other.

In an attempt to deal with the situation they drive out to a pond to talk about things, but a similar story from Claire’s childhood, seems to overwhelm her, and she slaps Stuart. After a while they drive home.
Everything just gets worse, after some time Claire sleeps on the couch, and she won’t let Stuart touch her anymore.

Claire learns about the funeral, and heads up for it. There she finds out that the killer has been caught, but everything isn’t back to normal. She seems to despise Stuart more and more, and their relationship reaches some sort of a breaking point as the story ends.


THE INTERPRETATION:


The story raises a question of how someone, a character, can possibly be known completely. It asks how an individual's mind can possibly be understood or predicted. Given the situation in this story, Woman is doing the questioning, the searching, the demanding of answers. The Man is functioning on emotion and even attempting to avoid that by keeping his words to himself.

The actual text itself can be seen as a destruction of traditional fiction narratives; to make a tale's purpose something that the reader must uncover rather than receive extraneously.

LITERARY GENRE: NOVEL



THE BIRTH OF VENUS: A NOVEL

Sarah Dunant




Humanist Literary Criticism is a philosophy for the here and now. Humanists regard human values as making sense only in the context of human life rather than in the promise of a supposed life after death. Humanism is, in sum, a philosophy for those in love with life. Humanists take responsibility for their own lives and relish the adventure of being part of new discoveries, seeking new knowledge, exploring new options. Instead of finding solace in prefabricated answers to the great questions of life, Humanists enjoy the open-endedness of a quest and the freedom of discovery that this entails




The Plot Summary:



Alessandra Cecchi is not quite fifteen when her father, a prosperous cloth merchant, brings a young painter back from northern Europe to decorate the chapel walls in the family’s Florentine palazzo. A child of the Renaissance, with a precocious mind and a talent for drawing, Alessandra is intoxicated by the painter’s abilities.

But their burgeoning relationship is interrupted when Alessandra’s parents arrange her marriage to a wealthy, much older man. Meanwhile, Florence is changing, increasingly subject to the growing suppression imposed by the fundamentalist monk Savonarola, who is seizing religious and political control. Alessandra and her native city are caught between the Medici state, with its love of luxury, learning, and dazzling art, and the hellfire preaching and increasing violence of Savonarola’s reactionary followers. Played out against this turbulent backdrop, Alessandra’s married life is a misery, except for the surprising freedom it allows her to pursue her powerful attraction to the young painter and his art.



THE INTERPRETATION:


Alessandra's story, though central, is only one part of this multi-faceted and complex historical novel. Dunant paints a fascinating array of women onto her dark canvas, each representing the various fates of early Renaissance women: Alessandra's lovely (if simple) sister Plautilla is interested only in marrying rich and presiding over a household; the brave Erila, Alessandra's North African servant has such a frank understanding of the limitations of her sex that she often escapes them; and Signora Cecchi, Alessandra's beautiful but weary mother tries to encourage yet temper the passions of her wayward daughter.

Literary Genre: POETRY



ANNABEL LEE

Edgar Allan Poe




Romanticism Literary Theory is most closely associated with the writings of William Wordsworth in his Preface to Lyrical Ballads(1800) and Samuel Taylor Coleridge in his Biographia Literaria (1817). Modern critics disagree on whether the work of Wordsworth and Coleridge constituted a major break with the criticism of their predecessors or if it should more properly be characterized as a continuation of the aesthetic theories of seventeenth- and eighteenth-century German and English writers.


The Poem:



It was many and many a year ago,
In a kingdom by the sea,
That a maiden there lived whom you may know
By the name of ANNABEL LEE;
And this maiden she lived with no other thought
Than to love and be loved by me.

I was a child and she was a child,
In this kingdom by the sea;
But we loved with a love that was more than love-
I and my Annabel Lee;
With a love that the winged seraphs of heaven
Coveted her and me.

And this was the reason that, long ago,
In this kingdom by the sea,
A wind blew out of a cloud, chilling
My beautiful Annabel Lee;
So that her highborn kinsman came
And bore her away from me,
To shut her up in a sepulchre
In this kingdom by the sea.

The angels, not half so happy in heaven,
Went envying her and me-
Yes!- that was the reason (as all men know,
In this kingdom by the sea)
That the wind came out of the cloud by night,
Chilling and killing my Annabel Lee.

But our love it was stronger by far than the love
Of those who were older than we-
Of many far wiser than we-
And neither the angels in heaven above,
Nor the demons down under the sea,
Can ever dissever my soul from the soul
Of the beautiful Annabel Lee.

For the moon never beams without bringing me dreams
Of the beautiful Annabel Lee;
And the stars never rise but I feel the bright eyes
Of the beautiful Annabel Lee;
And so, all the night-tide, I lie down by the side
Of my darling- my darling- my life and my bride,
In the sepulchre there by the sea,
In her tomb by the sounding sea. 




THE INTERPRETATION:



The poem Annabel Lee by Edgar Allan Poe is a perfect example of the Romanticism period that started in Europe. The most prominent qualities of Romanticism are nature, emotion, love, spirituality, and the supernatural. Annabel Lee is poem that is very tragic, emotional, and descriptive.

The narrator goes through the poem and describes his love (which began many years ago in an unnamed "kingdom by the sea"), Annabel Lee, her beauty, and then her death. When Annabel Lee tragically dies, the narrator says that the angels up in heaven were jealous of the love and happiness they shared, and therefore took Annabel Lee's life. It is very clear that the narrator's love for Annabel Lee is eternal, and their love is strong enough to extend beyond the grave. The narrator deeply believes that their souls are still entwined. Every night, he dreams of Annabel Lee and sees the brightness of her eyes in the stars, even admitting that every night he lies down by her side in her tomb by the sea. 

Monday, January 14, 2013


LITERARY GENRE: SONNET


SONNET XXXVII

William Shakespeare




New Historicism was developed in the 1980's, supported by Stephen Blatt. The literary work tries to tell us something in ideology. However, New Historicists take this position further by then claiming that all cultural activities may be considered as equally important texts for historical analysis: contemporary trials of hermaphrodites or the intricacies of map-making may inform a Shakespeare play as much as, say, Shakespeare's literary precursors. New Historicism is also more specifically concerned with questions of power and culture (especially the messy commingling of the social and the cultural or of the supposedly autonomous self and the cultural/ political institutions that in fact produce that self).


The Sonnet:



As a decrepit father takes delight
To see his active child do deeds of youth,
So I, made lame by Fortune's dearest spite,
Take all my comfort of thy worth and truth; 
For whether beauty, birth, or wealth, or wit,
Or any of these all, or all, or more,
Entitled in thy parts, do crowned sit,
I make my love engrafted to this store:
So then I am not lame, poor, nor despised,
Whilst that this shadow doth such substance give
That I in thy abundance am sufficed,
And by a part of all thy glory live.
Look what is best, that best I wish in thee:
This wish I have; then ten times happy me!



THE INTERPRETATION:


The Sonnet XXXVII suits for the New Historicism Theory because as the interlude occurs, the poet takes stock and reflects on what the youth has given him. Though he himself is old and useless, the abundance of the youth's qualities feeds into his soul. This transforms him and removes his lameness and his failures. The youth has everything that is desirable, and the great store of his qualities diffuses its glory around. The poet is contented, for he sees that his beloved has all that is best, all that he could wish for him, and he basks in this reflected glory, his decrepit status now entirely forgotten.


LITERARY GENRE: PLAY



CLOUD NINE

Caryl Churchill





Post-colonialism Theory is the extension of one's rule. It examines the effects of imperialistic views in postcolonial societies. Post-colonial theory also deals with the reading and writing of literature in previously or currently colonized countries, or literatures written in colonizing countries, which deals with colonization or colonized people.



The Plot Summary:


Act I


Clive, a British colonial administrator, lives with his family, a governess and servant during turbulent times in Africa. The natives are rioting and Mrs Saunders, a widow, comes to them to seek safety. Her arrival is soon followed by Harry Bagley, an explorer. Clive makes passionate advances to Mrs Saunders, his wife Betty fancies Harry, who secretly has sex with the servant Joshua and Clive's son Edward. The governess Ellen, who reveals herself to be a lesbian, is forced into marriage with Harry after his sexuality is discovered and condemned by Clive. Act 1 ends with the wedding celebrations; the final scene is Clive giving a speech while Joshua is pointing a gun at him.

Act II


Although Act 2 is set in 1979, some of the characters of Act 1 are reappearing – for them only 25 years have passed. Betty has left Clive, her daughter Victoria is now married to an overbearing Martin, and Edward has an openly gay relationship with Gerry. Victoria, upset and distant from Martin, starts a lesbian relationship with Lin. When Gerry leaves Edward, Edward, who discovers he is in fact bisexual, moves in with his sister and Lin. The three of them have a drunken ceremony in which they call up the Goddess, and after that characters from Act 1 begin appearing in Act 2. Act 2 has a looser structure than Act 1, and Churchill played around with the ordering of the scenes. The final scene shows that Victoria has left Martin for a mĂ©nage Ă  trois with Edward and Lin, and they are sharing custody of their son Tommy. Gerry and Edward are on good terms again, and Betty becomes friends with Gerry, who tells her about Edward's sexuality.



THE INTERPRETATION:


This play fits the Postcolonialism Theory because this deals explicitly with the ‘double colonization' of women by both their male counterparts.
Essentially a gendered critique of familial and sexual roles in Victorian colonial society, the play comically utilises cross-dressing and role-doubling to explore the relationship between colonial and sexual oppression throughout history.



LITERARY GENRE: NOVEL


LOVER

Bertha Harris




Feminism Literary Theory is an international peer reviewed journal that provides a forum for critical analysis and constructive debate within feminism. Feminist Theory is also genuinely interdisciplinary and reflects the diversity of feminism, incorporating perspectives from across the broad spectrum of the humanities and social sciences and the full range of feminist political and theoretical stances.

The Plot Summary:



Lover's prose is distinctly postmodern, eschewing conventional narrative for experimental narrative techniques. Incontrast to some lesbian novels of the time, such as Rita Mae Brown's Rubyfruit Jungle (also, incidentally, published by Daughters), which used a prototypical bildungsroman technique with a lesbian placed squarely at the center, Lover reflects complex notions of radical lesbian philosophy, community, family structure, and eroticism by using highly inventive, often fantastical storytelling techniques. In Harris's introduction to the 1993 edition, she writes, "Lover should be absorbed as if it were a theatrical performance. There's tap dancing and singing, disguise, sleights of hand, mirror illusions, quick-change acts, and drag." Amanda C. Gable has argued that Lover "can be considered an exemplary novel within discussions of both postmodern fiction and lesbian (or queer) theory," and calls for "Harris to be added to the group of writers such as Wittig, AnzaldĂșa, Lorde, and Winterson, who are discussed within the context of a postmodern lesbian narrative."


THE INTERPRETATION:



Bertha Harris was one of the most stylishly innovative American fiction writers to emerge in the wake Stonewall. Possessing a fine aesthetic sensibility and a sense of fantasy, her experiments with the form of the novel were unlike any other examples of "new lesbian fiction" that had been published prior to her work.

Harris says that "Lover should be absorbed as if it were a theatrical performance. There's tap dancing and singing, disguise, sleights of hand, mirror illusions, quick-change acts, and drag." The minds of the "sexual subversives" she writes about seem to meet on an interior plane, in which conventional storytelling gives way to brilliant imagery and electric verbal wordplay.

Harris expressed her hope that lesbian fiction would develop into an entirely new and elegant genre, far from the restrictions of nineteenth-century style that seem to typify the romances and detective fiction of the 1990s. With Lover she showed us what this genre might be like.



MOVIE



FIRST KNIGHT

Directed by Jerry Zucker




Structuralism Theory relates literary texts to a larger structure, which may be a particular genre, a range of intertextual connections, a model of a universal narrative structure, or a system of recurrent patterns or motifs. Structuralism argues that there must be a structure in every text, which explains why it is easier for experienced readers than for non-experienced readers to interpret a text. Hence, everything that is written seems to be governed by specific rules, or a "grammar of literature", that one learns in educational institutions and that are to be unmasked.

Structuralistic literary criticism argues that the "literary banter of a text" can lie only in new structure, rather than in the specifics of character development and voice in which that structure is expressed.


The Plot Summary:


Lancelot lives by the sword. In fact, they're next door neighbours, so teaming up to fight for money comes pretty naturally. Lady Guinevere, on her way to marry King Arthur is ambushed by the evil Sir Malagant. Fortunately Lancelot is lurking nearby and he rescues his future queen. They fall in love, but Guinevere still fancies the idea of wearing a crown, so she honours her promise to Arthur.



THE INTERPRETATION:


The film follows the rogue Lancelot's romance with Lady Guinevere of Leonesse, who is to marry King Arthur of Camelot, while the land is threatened by the renegade knight Malagant. The film is noteworthy within Arthurian cinema for its absence of magical elements. It looks for underlying elements in culture and literature that are connected and so that its viewers can develop conclusions about the movie.



MOVIE



WAKING LIFE

Directed by Richard Linklater




Existentialism Literary Theory involves the attempt to make meaning in a chaotic world. Sartre argued, "man makes himself." As a form of literary criticism, existentialism seeks to analyze literary works, with special emphasis on the struggle to define meaning and identity in the face of alienation and isolation.

The Plot Summary:


Waking Life is about an unnamed young man living an ethereal existence that lacks transitions between everyday events and that eventually progresses toward an existentialism crisis. For most of the film he observes quietly but later participates actively in philosophical discussions involving other characters—ranging from quirky scholars and artists to everyday restaurant-goers and friends—about such issues as metaphysics, free will, social philosophy, and the meaning of life. Other scenes do not even include the protagonist's presence, but rather, show an isolated person or couple speaking about such topics from a disembodied perspective. Along the way, the film touches also upon existentialism, situationist politics, posthumanity, the film theory of Andre Bazin, and lucid dreaming, and makes references to various celebrated intellectual and literary figures by name.


Gradually, the protagonist begins to realize that he is living out a perpetual dream, broken up only by occasional false awakenings. So far he is mostly a passive onlooker, though this changes during a chat with a passing woman who suddenly approaches him. After she eccentrically greets and shares her creative ideas with him, he reminds himself of his recent realization and of the fact that she must, therefore, be a figment of his own dreaming imagination. Afterwards, he starts to converse more openly with other dream characters as well; however, he ultimately begins to despair about being utterly trapped in this unending, irresolvable dream-state.


The protagonist's final talk is with a character who looks somewhat similar to the protagonist himself and whom he briefly encountered previously, earlier on in the film. This last conversation reveals this other character's understanding that reality may be only a single instant that the individual interprets falsely as time (and, thus, life); that living is simply the individual's constant negation of God's invitation to become one with the universe; that dreams offer a glimpse into the infinite nature of reality; and that in order to be free from the illusion called life, the individual need only to accept God's invitation—though he does not explicitly explain how this is achieved.


The protagonist is last seen walking into a driveway when he suddenly begins to levitate, paralleling a scene at the start of the film of a floating child in the same driveway. Unlike the child who grabbed firmly onto the handle of a nearby car, however, the protagonist uncertainly reaches toward the same handle but is too swiftly lifted above the vehicle and over the trees. He now rises into the endless blue expanse of the sky until he disappears from view altogether.



THE INTERPRETATION:


Every once in a while, a movie is made that challenges all of the industry standards. Most of these movies don’t hold up, but occasionally, a few of them do. Waking Life is one of these movies. Exhibiting anything but traditional film making, it is a rotoscope animation, depicting what it means to exist on this earth. It is about a man trapped between 2 realms: the waking world, and the dreaming world. He is not entirely sure which realm he is in, and seeks to find the meaning of his existence. A highly recommended movie, which is a deep philosophical study of consciousness and existentialism.

In Waking Life, the main character communicates with dream characters, who all voice their opinion on what life is. Some are optimistic, some are extremely pessimistic, violent, or corrupt. Some are enthusiastic about life, while others are depressed and suicidal. All of these dream characters can represent the types of people in the waking world. Some of us are happier than others, some of us are violent, and some of us are more neutral. Regardless of our personality type, we all wonder why we are here, and what our dreams really are.


LITERARY GENRE: SHORT STORY


THE UNDEFEATED

Ernest Hemingway




Psychoanalytic Literary Theory  refers to the definition and dynamics of personality development which underlie and guide psychoanalytic and psychodynamic psychotherapy. First laid out by Sigmund Freud, psychoanalytic theory has undergone many refinements since his work . Psychoanalytic theory came to full prominence as a critical force in the last third of the twentieth century as part of the flow of critical discourse after the 1960s. Freud ceased his analysis of the brain and his physiological studies in order to turn his focus to the study of the mind and the related psychological attributes making up the mind, something not many psychologists were willing to do. His study then included recognizing childhood events that could potentially lead to the mental functioning of adults. He examined the genetic and then the developmental aspects that made the psychoanalytic theory become what it was.




The Plot Summary:




The short story entitled The Undefeated (1927) addresses death through bullfighting. Manuel, the main character, goes to Retana, a man who is in charge of bullfighting, and asks to bullfight to make some money. Retana is unfriendly, seemingly uncaring, and tells Manuel that the only thing he can let him do is fight at a night show as a substitute for an injured bullfighter. Night shows pay the least amount of money and are less glorious than the day shows. Bullfighting has brought death into Manuel’s family in the past, killing his brother, but this does not stop him from participating in it. Manuel is reluctant, to fight, but gives in and asks Zurito, a picador he knows, to help him. A signifier that a man is a bullfighter is the coleta, or pigtail, he wears in his hair. At the beginning, Manuel kept it hidden, but later lets it hang down for others to see. Zurito does not want to help Manuel because he thinks he is too old, and threatens to cut off his coleta. However, Zurito decides to help on the condition that Manuel stop fighting if this fight does not go well. Manuel fights that night and indeed it does not go well.


The story ends with Manuel badly hurt by the bull, and Zurito by his side. Despite the seriousness of his injuries, Manuel is still trying to convince himself and others that he is fine and that he fought a good fight. The fighting in this story can be seen as the Imaginary Order. Physical pleasure does not always have to come from the fulfillment of sexual desires; it can come from other pleasures as well. Bullfighting brings an adrenaline rush to the fighter and a sense of excitement. Thus, the physical pleasure in this story comes with the bullfighting. But, with this comes the realization of the loss of wholeness, seen in the Symbolic Order. This loss is seen when Manuel first goes to Retana and is rejected for the day fight, and has to substitute for an injured night fighter. Manuel sees his lack of wholeness as his strength diminishes and he realizes he is not the bullfighter he once was. He has to accept the rules that Retana has set for him. There are two images that foreshadow the eventual end. The first is the bullhead above Retana’s head, mounted on the wall of his office. This is the head of the bull that killed Manuel’s brother, and represents the authority that Retana has over Manuel and the loss of wholeness that Manuel’s brother’s death has brought to him. It also symbolizes the danger that looms over Manuel and that caused his brother’s death. Secondly, Zurito threatens Manuel that he will cut off his coleta because he should not be fighting any more. This threat is like a threat to life for Manuel, in the same way that death is a constant threat Hemingway. Later, Manuel goes to a bar and talks to some waiters who realize that he is a bullfighter. After talking to him about his fighting for a short time, they finally forget that he is there. “Manuel looked at them, standing talking in front of his table. He had drunk his second brandy. They had forgotten about him. They were not interested in him.” Manuel was not well known, and the fact that he would be fighting at night made the waiters less interested in him. As the story proceeds, the reader is left with disappointment and lost hope.


At the end of the bullfight, Manuel grows tired, less focused, and angry. His confidence has turned into loss. Finally at the end of the story, the reader sees the Real Order through Hemingway’s writing. The last fight of Manuel’s life shows all that he is not. Though he has killed the bull, he cannot hold on to his own life. The blood of the bull shows that he conquered some of the trials of life, but Manuel lies there almost dead. The last lines show this tension. Manuel asks Zurito if he had fought well, and Zurito gives a positive answer, though he betrays what he truly believes. Then, “the doctor’s assistant put the cone over Manuel’s face and he inhaled deeply. Zurito stood awkwardly, watching.” Manuel is dying, and though he tries to deny it, he lacks the strength that he once had.


THE INTERPRETATION:


Much of Hemingway's writing is characterized by themes of pride, the struggle to maintain masculinity and durability in the face of natural, cultural, or artistic obstacles. In "The Undefeated," the protagonist is Manuel Garcia, a veteran bullfighter, who basically has to beg Retana, a promoter, for work. Retana finally agrees, giving Manuel a fraction (300 pesetas) of what the younger, more popular bullfighters are making. Manuel then goes to a cafe to wait for his friend, Zurito, a picador (a horseman who uses a lance to help the bullfighter). Zurito tells them they're both too old. He pleads with Zurito to "pic" for him, and Zurito only concedes after Manuel agrees that if he does not perform well, he will quit for good. Fighting with Hernandez, another up-and-coming bullfighter, they engage in a long battle with a bull.

Readers get perspectives mostly from Manuel, but also from the audience, a bull-fight critic, Zurito, and even the bull itself. It takes Manuel five tries to stab the bull. In the end, Manuel kills the bull, but is gored and rushed to to the doctor. While Manuel lies on the operating table, Zurito raises a pair of scissors to cut off Manuel's coleta (pigtail), a veritable castration which would symbolically end Manuel's bullfighting career.


Hemingway’s desire was to conquer defeat, and though his title goes along with this, the message of his story shows that in the end, reality proves differently.



LITERARY GENRE: NOVEL



THE AUTOBIOGRAPHY OF ALICE B. TOKLAS

Gertrude Stein



Autobiographical Criticism is primarily treated as men's life writing.

The Plot Summary:


Stein inhabits the persona and speech patterns of Toklas throughout the book. The perceptions of other characters and the recounting of events, however, belong to both Stein and Toklas. For continuity, the narrator of the book will be referred to as Toklas.


Toklas introduces herself and provides some details about her life, mentioning, importantly, that her life changed after the San Francisco earthquake, and she met Gertrude Stein. Saying that she has only met three geniuses in her life, Toklas writes, "The three geniuses of whom I wish to speak are Gertrude Stein, Pablo Picasso, and Alfred Whitehead."



THE INTERPRETATION:


Gertrude Stein has written her memoirs. But she has attributed them to her friend and companion of twenty-five years, Alice B. Toklas; and her book is thus something a little different from the ordinary book of memoirs. It is Gertrude Stein's imaginative projection of how she and her life and her circle look to Alice B. Toklas. Miss Toklas is presented as the enthusiastic admirer and the obedient shadow of Miss Stein; she turns toward her as the sunflower toward the sun. Yet Miss Toklas's personality is by no means indistinguishable from Miss Stein's: Miss Stein has created her as an individual. And thus The Autobiography of Alice B. Toklas has something of the character and charm of a novel — a novel of which the subject is the life which Miss Stein and Miss Toklas have made together in Paris, the salon over which they have presided, the whole complex of ideas and events of which they became the center: a social-artistic-intellectual organism.


LITERARY GENRE: POETRY



I TAUGHT MYSELF TO LIVE SIMPLY

Anna Akhmatova




Reader Response Theory considers readers' reactions to literature as vital to interpreting the meaning of the text. However, reader-response criticism can take a number of different approaches. A critic deploying reader-response theory can use a psychoanalytic lens, a feminists lens, or even a structuralist lens. What these different lenses have in common when using a reader response approach is they maintain "...that what a text is cannot be separated from what it does" (Tyson 154).

The Poem



I taught myself to live simply and wisely,
to look at the sky and pray to God,
and to wander long before evening
to tire my superfluous worries.
When the burdocks rustle in the ravine
and the yellow-red rowanberry cluster droops
I compose happy verses
about life's decay, decay and beauty.
I come back. The fluffy cat
licks my palm, purrs so sweetly
and the fire flares bright
on the saw-mill turret by the lake.
Only the cry of a stork landing on the roof
occasionally breaks the silence.
If you knock on my door
I may not even hear. 



THE INTERPRETATION:


Apparently, by writing poetry, she seems to be able to dissect herself from the world. Surrounding herself in her own thoughts, she begins to understand more about it. The poor, the ugly, the rich, and the beautiful; she takes in all their features, mesmerizing herself in a world of only her words. Simple is her pleasant reminder of the world she lives in. She writes of a place she hopes to belong to, a place of longing, she seems to have given up hope for it though; deciding that it’s much too complicate to hope for something like that, and preferring to keep it simple. Clearly, this poem was written in what appears to be a somewhat painful moment, with a lot of emotion and hidden meanings behind it.

LITERARY GENRE: POETRY

THE PIG

Roald Dahl




New Criticism Theory  focused on the text of a work of literature and tried to exclude the reader's response, the author's intention, historical and cultural contexts, and moralistic bias from their analysis. New Critics often performed a "close reading" of the text and believed the structure and meaning of the text were intimately connected and should not be analyzed separately. Before the New Criticism became dominant, English professors in America focused their writings and teaching on historical and/or linguistic scholarship surrounding literature rather than analyzing the literary text itself.

The Poem


In England once there lived a big
And wonderfully clever pig.
To everybody it was plain
That Piggy had a massive brain.
He worked out sums inside his head,
There was no book he hadn't read.
He knew what made an airplane fly,
He knew how engines worked and why.
He knew all this, but in the end
One question drove him round the bend:
He simply couldn't puzzle out
What LIFE was really all about.
What was the reason for his birth?
Why was he placed upon this earth?
His giant brain went round and round.
Alas, no answer could be found.
Till suddenly one wondrous night.
All in a flash he saw the light.
He jumped up like a ballet dancer
And yelled, "By gum, I've got the answer!"
"They want my bacon slice by slice
"To sell at a tremendous price!
"They want my tender juicy chops
"To put in all the butcher's shops!
"They want my pork to make a roast
"And that's the part'll cost the most!
"They want my sausages in strings!
"They even want my chitterlings!
"The butcher's shop! The carving knife!
"That is the reason for my life!"
Such thoughts as these are not designed
To give a pig great piece of mind.
Next morning, in comes Farmer Bland,
A pail of pigswill in his hand,
And piggy with a mighty roar,
Bashes the farmer to the floor…
Now comes the rather grizzly bit
So let's not make too much of it,
Except that you must understand
That Piggy did eat Farmer Bland,
He ate him up from head to toe,
Chewing the pieces nice and slow.
It took an hour to reach the feet,
Because there was so much to eat,
And when he finished, Pig, of course,
Felt absolutely no remorse.
Slowly he scratched his brainy head
And with a little smile he said,
"I had a fairly powerful hunch
"That he might have me for his lunch.
"And so, because I feared the worst,
"I thought I'd better eat him first."


THE INTERPRETATION:



Roald Dahl has portrayed an interesting conflict between the “meaning of life” and “survival of the fittest”. The poem outlines the story of an intelligent pig that knows every single thing on Earth but astonishingly is unaware about the real meaning of life. The Pig simply has no clue as to why he was placed on the Earth and what is the motive of his life.

The pig has been compared to a normal individual who despite being knowledgeable about everything in the society including mathematics, flying an aeroplane, knowing how an engine works, having almost all the information his massive brain can fill in.

Despite knowing everything about his surroundings, despite having read all the books when it comes to knowing the meaning and significance of life, his knowledge is zero. The lines “What was the reason for his birth? Why was he placed upon this earth?” Reveal the curious nature of the young masses today who has puzzled their life to such an extent that they cannot understand what the simple thing called life is? This is the reality of each and every individual today. They plan everything in their life, every single event is pre-planned; but they fail to understand the essence of life.